The Dispute with Catholics – The Primacy of Peter and the Primacy of Rome

Explains the Coptic Orthodox understanding of the primacy of Peter and the primacy of Rome, clarifying that the Church does not believe in the supremacy of a single person or see, but in spiritual leadership based on sound faith, conciliarity, and the equality of the apostles.

Lecture Summary

1. His Holiness Pope Shenouda III explains that the dispute over the primacy of Peter and Rome is an ancient doctrinal and ecclesiastical issue, not merely an administrative difference.

2. He affirms that the Coptic Orthodox Church does not believe that Peter the Apostle was a ruler over the other apostles, but one of them, equal in mission and authority.

3. He explains that biblical texts used to support Peter’s primacy are understood spiritually and confessionally, not as granting absolute or hereditary authority.

4. He clarifies that Christ’s words, “You are Peter, and on this rock I will build My Church,” refer to the faith confessed by Peter, not to his person alone.

5. He affirms that Peter himself never acted as a supreme leader, but submitted with the other apostles to the decisions of the Apostolic Council in Jerusalem.

6. He rejects the idea that Peter’s primacy was transferred to the bishops of Rome, noting that Scripture does not explicitly teach this doctrine.

7. He explains that Rome’s primacy was a primacy of honor and love, not of authority and domination over other churches.

8. He affirms that the early Church was governed by conciliarity, where major issues were resolved through councils, not individual decisions.

9. He clarifies that Orthodox faith rejects absolute infallibility for any human being, since infallibility belongs to God alone.

10. He concludes by affirming that the unity of the Church is founded on unity of true faith, not on administrative submission to a single see.

For better translation support, please contact the center.