Penalties relating to the clergy
His Holiness Pope Shenouda III clarifies in this lecture the rules of penalties specific to the clergy (bishops, priests, deacons) and the means of ecclesial accountability, emphasizing that there is no favoritism for anyone before the law and the ecclesial injunction.
Complaint route and referral
If someone feels wronged by a priest or bishop he may complain; the complaint rises to the bishop, and if he does not resolve it it is raised to the patriarch, and if not resolved it is referred to the Holy Synod and the diocesan affairs committees or the clerical council according to the rank of the accused.
Types of penalties and procedures
Penalties range between: suspension from the service of one sacrament or more, general suspension from all sacraments as a prelude to trial, trial with hearing of witnesses, and the judgment of laicization or removal from the priesthood when the crime is proven. Accuracy is considered in accepting testimonies and originals of evidence.
Principles of trial and ecclesial justice
No judgment without trial; the accused is given the opportunity to defend. Caution against quick or emotional judgments — the biblical teachings (letters of Timothy and Titus) are cited which command wisdom and not hastiness in cutting off.
Examples of crimes leading to severe penalties
Among them: simony (buying the rank), heresy, adultery, theft, harshness and beating of believers, usury, gross neglect of ministry, engaging in worldly work instead of dedicating oneself to ministry, marriage after ordination in unauthorized cases, and performing prayers or liturgies with the excommunicated or heretics.
Effects of the penalty on family and church
A reminder that judgments issued on a priest affect his reputation and the church’s reputation and sometimes the lives of believers, therefore penalties are applied with wisdom so as not to harm the community without justification.
Rules for taking cases to civil authorities
Civil recourse is possible for ordinary matters, but if a priest resorts to civil courts against the church he may be deposed. The church seeks to resolve what it can internally before moving to civil authorities.
Brief conclusion
The lecture calls for fair and disciplined accountability of the clergy, taking into account the biblical texts and ecclesial laws, and applying penalties with caution and a reformative—not vindictive—spirit.
For better translation support, please contact the center.
